PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-269.22%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
100.00%
Positive operating income growth while DC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-86.76%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
22.89%
Positive EPS growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
22.89%
Positive diluted EPS growth while DC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-253.81%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-3005.64%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.31%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-80.31%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-253.02%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while DC stands at 52.61%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
94.22%
Positive 10Y CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
94.22%
Positive 5Y CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-349.23%
Negative 3Y CAGR while DC is 29.50%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-80.51%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while DC stands at 3427.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-80.51%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while DC is at 3427.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-24.33%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
498.50%
AR growth of 498.50% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
1.48%
Positive asset growth while DC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
6.35%
Positive BV/share change while DC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.40%
We expand SG&A while DC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.