PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-100.00%
Negative revenue growth while DC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
73.96%
Gross profit growth of 73.96% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
16.17%
Positive EBIT growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2.48%
Positive operating income growth while DC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-0.22%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-0.69%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-0.69%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.60%
Share reduction more than 1.5x DC's 14.84%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.59%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x DC's 14.84%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.23%
Positive OCF growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
33.19%
Positive FCF growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.46%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-458.46%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
27.88%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of DC's 52.61%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
46.25%
Positive 10Y CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-2405.60%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
2.22%
Below 50% of DC's 29.50%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
54.61%
Below 50% of DC's 3427.35%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
1193.41%
Below 50% of DC's 3427.35%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-62.41%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.73%
Firm’s AR is declining while DC shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
16.36%
Positive asset growth while DC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.78%
Positive BV/share change while DC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
151.63%
We have some new debt while DC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.89%
We expand SG&A while DC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.