PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.56%
Revenue growth of 20.56% while DC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
5.78%
Gross profit growth of 5.78% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-33.73%
Negative EBIT growth while DC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
36.02%
Operating income growth above 1.5x DC's 7.31%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-103.18%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-103.43%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-103.51%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-5.60%
Share reduction while DC is at 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-7.69%
Reduced diluted shares while DC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.72%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
34.45%
Positive FCF growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
452662.29%
3Y CAGR of 452662.29% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
1349.50%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
1029.72%
Positive OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
520.34%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
85.45%
Positive 10Y CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
88.66%
Positive 5Y CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
89.51%
Positive short-term CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
176.23%
Below 50% of DC's 4817.08%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
9.64%
Below 50% of DC's 4817.08%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
27.12%
Below 50% of DC's 4817.08%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.39%
Firm’s AR is declining while DC shows 602.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
44.93%
Inventory growth of 44.93% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
6.05%
Positive asset growth while DC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
12.45%
Positive BV/share change while DC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-7.95%
We’re deleveraging while DC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.06%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.