PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.58%
Revenue growth of 2.58% while DC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
-0.29%
Negative gross profit growth while DC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
55.73%
EBIT growth of 55.73% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
-39.93%
Negative operating income growth while DC is at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
1589.95%
Positive net income growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1412.50%
Positive EPS growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1350.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while DC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
11.52%
Share count expansion well above DC's 1.51%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
17.15%
Diluted share count expanding well above DC's 1.51%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.60%
OCF growth above 1.5x DC's 1.38%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
13.76%
Positive FCF growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4703886.36%
3Y CAGR of 4703886.36% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
837.52%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
869.30%
Positive OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
380.28%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
450.21%
Positive 10Y CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
318.45%
Positive 5Y CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
207.56%
Positive short-term CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
322.21%
Equity/share CAGR of 322.21% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
69.00%
Equity/share CAGR of 69.00% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
106.51%
Equity/share CAGR of 106.51% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.52%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
18.51%
Inventory growth of 18.51% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
41.95%
Positive asset growth while DC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
54.35%
Positive BV/share change while DC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.60%
We’re deleveraging while DC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.50%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.