PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.91%
Negative revenue growth while DC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-15.73%
Negative gross profit growth while DC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-23.90%
Negative EBIT growth while DC is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-42.51%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-29.19%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-34.96%
Negative EPS growth while DC is at 27.78%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-33.82%
Negative diluted EPS growth while DC is at 27.78%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
1.93%
Share reduction more than 1.5x DC's 95.77%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
1.12%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x DC's 95.77%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-115.46%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-132.78%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.94%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
34.72%
Positive OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
61.39%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
367.45%
Positive 10Y CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
232.82%
Positive 5Y CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
173.49%
Positive short-term CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
372.05%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x DC's 149.10%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
32.63%
Below 50% of DC's 149.10%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
115.79%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of DC's 149.10%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.65%
Firm’s AR is declining while DC shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
10.83%
Inventory growth of 10.83% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-2.56%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
2.43%
Positive BV/share change while DC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-4.31%
We’re deleveraging while DC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.82%
We expand SG&A while DC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.