PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.92%
Revenue growth of 15.92% while DC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
16.66%
Positive gross profit growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
24.32%
EBIT growth of 24.32% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
70.99%
Positive operating income growth while DC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-3.08%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.95%
Negative diluted EPS growth while DC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-3.08%
Share reduction while DC is at 2.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
1.15%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x DC's 2.98%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
573.30%
Positive OCF growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
341.16%
Positive FCF growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1387.63%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
424.22%
Positive OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
2558.81%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
748.61%
Positive 10Y CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
246.44%
Positive 5Y CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
506.34%
Positive short-term CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
461.51%
Below 50% of DC's 3817.08%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
22.94%
Below 50% of DC's 3817.08%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
96.23%
Below 50% of DC's 3817.08%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1524.69%
AR growth well above DC's 7.53%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
8.52%
Inventory growth of 8.52% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
5.47%
Positive asset growth while DC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
11.98%
Positive BV/share change while DC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-4.61%
We’re deleveraging while DC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.50%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.