10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.72%
Revenue growth of 1.72% while DC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
-6.23%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-19.86%
Negative EBIT growth while DC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-6.23%
Negative operating income growth while DC is at 12.95%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-58.14%
Negative net income growth while DC stands at 13.03%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-57.75%
Negative EPS growth while DC is at 15.38%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-59.49%
Negative diluted EPS growth while DC is at 15.38%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-2.14%
Share reduction while DC is at 2.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.64%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x DC's 2.81%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.40%
OCF growth above 1.5x DC's 4.74%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
0.53%
FCF growth under 50% of DC's 4.15%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3068.75%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
319.68%
Positive OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
388.38%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
329.83%
Positive 10Y CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
147.34%
Positive 5Y CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
150.89%
Positive short-term CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
487.89%
Equity/share CAGR of 487.89% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
28.48%
Equity/share CAGR of 28.48% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
108.08%
Equity/share CAGR of 108.08% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.84%
Firm’s AR is declining while DC shows 3.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
5.83%
Inventory growth of 5.83% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
2.68%
Positive asset growth while DC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.76%
Positive BV/share change while DC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
20.36%
Debt growth of 20.36% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.42%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.