PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
25.70%
Revenue growth of 25.70% while DC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
40.49%
Gross profit growth of 40.49% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
65.42%
Positive EBIT growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
51.02%
Positive operating income growth while DC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
39.40%
Positive net income growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
38.22%
Positive EPS growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
37.03%
Positive diluted EPS growth while DC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.92%
Share count expansion well above DC's 0.56%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.62%
Diluted share count expanding well above DC's 0.56%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.13%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x DC's 44.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
87.44%
FCF growth above 1.5x DC's 42.65%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
638007.73%
5Y CAGR of 638007.73% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2559.64%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
922.41%
Positive OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
91608.89%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1323.86%
Positive 10Y CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
439.70%
Positive 5Y CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
2117.54%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x DC's 11.05%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
1870.13%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of DC's 3354.11%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
112.28%
Below 50% of DC's 3354.11%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
104.44%
Equity/share CAGR of 104.44% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-54.70%
Firm’s AR is declining while DC shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
0.01%
Inventory growth of 0.01% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
6.74%
Asset growth above 1.5x DC's 0.83%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
8.12%
Positive BV/share change while DC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-10.98%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.87%
We cut SG&A while DC invests at 24.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.