PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.43%
Revenue growth of 17.43% while DC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
19.06%
Gross profit growth of 19.06% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-0.76%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
51.47%
Positive operating income growth while DC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-12.86%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-13.50%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-13.31%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.72%
Share reduction more than 1.5x DC's 6.49%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.48%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x DC's 6.49%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.62%
Positive OCF growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
9.04%
Positive FCF growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8402402.28%
5Y CAGR of 8402402.28% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1862.77%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
665.23%
Positive OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
1450.91%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2319.35%
Positive 10Y CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
325.48%
Positive 5Y CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
265.03%
Positive short-term CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1766.33%
Equity/share CAGR of 1766.33% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
133.97%
Equity/share CAGR of 133.97% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
89.89%
Equity/share CAGR of 89.89% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.87%
AR growth of 17.87% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
0.60%
Inventory growth of 0.60% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
4.15%
Positive asset growth while DC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.71%
Positive BV/share change while DC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-24.69%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.36%
We expand SG&A while DC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.