PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
51.64%
Revenue growth of 51.64% while DC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
20.77%
Gross profit growth of 20.77% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-180.56%
Negative EBIT growth while DC is at 37.77%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
72.34%
Operating income growth above 1.5x DC's 37.32%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-367.69%
Negative net income growth while DC stands at 38.03%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-368.62%
Negative EPS growth while DC is at 37.60%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-381.69%
Negative diluted EPS growth while DC is at 37.60%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.22%
Share reduction more than 1.5x DC's 3.54%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.22%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x DC's 3.54%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
818.43%
OCF growth above 1.5x DC's 48.17%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
-1121.77%
Negative FCF growth while DC is at 48.16%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
195.30%
3Y CAGR of 195.30% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
14434.01%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
3412.29%
Positive OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
1571.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x DC's 4.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-47476.14%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-297.95%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-409.43%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
1023.12%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x DC's 150.31%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
137.82%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with DC's 150.31%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
80.89%
Positive short-term equity growth while DC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.13%
AR growth of 79.13% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
120.96%
Inventory growth of 120.96% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
203.25%
Asset growth above 1.5x DC's 39.03%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-12.48%
We have a declining book value while DC shows 36.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
19103.99%
We have some new debt while DC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
173.81%
We expand SG&A while DC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.