10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
90.58%
Revenue growth of 90.58% while DC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
81.32%
Gross profit growth of 81.32% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
356.99%
Positive EBIT growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
56.24%
Positive operating income growth while DC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
169.04%
Positive net income growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
168.18%
Positive EPS growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
159.09%
Positive diluted EPS growth while DC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.78%
Share reduction more than 1.5x DC's 14.84%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
20.22%
Diluted share count expanding well above DC's 14.84%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.96%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
117.12%
Positive FCF growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
337.29%
3Y CAGR of 337.29% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
16338.30%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
9977.99%
Positive OCF/share growth while DC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
270.81%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x DC's 52.61%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
27178.37%
Positive 10Y CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
1607.41%
Positive 5Y CAGR while DC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
6396.02%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x DC's 29.50%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
3252.61%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with DC's 3427.35%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
114.35%
Below 50% of DC's 3427.35%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
78.54%
Positive short-term equity growth while DC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
101.30%
AR growth of 101.30% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
8.75%
Inventory growth of 8.75% while DC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
2.58%
Positive asset growth while DC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
10.99%
Positive BV/share change while DC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-5.06%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.41%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.