PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.44%
EBIT growth above 1.5x FURY's 33.82%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
81.44%
Positive operating income growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
83.34%
Net income growth above 1.5x FURY's 33.27%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
94.05%
EPS growth above 1.5x FURY's 50.00%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
94.05%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x FURY's 50.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
181.82%
Share count expansion well above FURY's 7.59%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
181.82%
Diluted share count expanding well above FURY's 5.93%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-168.42%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-168.42%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-69.66%
Firm’s AR is declining while FURY shows 29.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.63%
Negative asset growth while FURY invests at 11.84%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-66.52%
We have a declining book value while FURY shows 4.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-81.52%
We cut SG&A while FURY invests at 17.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.