PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.36%
EBIT growth similar to FURY's 33.82%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
31.36%
Positive operating income growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
18.69%
Net income growth at 50-75% of FURY's 33.27%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
19.08%
EPS growth under 50% of FURY's 50.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
19.08%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of FURY's 50.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.98%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-17.98%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.25%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is at 55.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-21.25%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is 50.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-21.25%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FURY is 69.62%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
44.00%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 28.55%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
44.00%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 21.58%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
44.00%
Positive short-term equity growth while FURY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
154.86%
AR growth well above FURY's 29.41%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.43%
Negative asset growth while FURY invests at 11.84%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.44%
We have a declining book value while FURY shows 4.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.97%
We cut SG&A while FURY invests at 17.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.