10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.58%
Positive EBIT growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
53.99%
Positive operating income growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
2.39%
Positive net income growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-244.02%
Negative OCF growth while FURY is at 47.76%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-218.85%
Negative FCF growth while FURY is at 47.76%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-78.18%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-78.18%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-78.18%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
78.75%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 78.75% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
78.75%
Net income/share CAGR of 78.75% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
78.75%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 78.75% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
-26.29%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FURY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-26.29%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-26.29%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.10%
AR growth of 9.10% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.75%
Negative asset growth while FURY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-4.16%
We have a declining book value while FURY shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.99%
We cut SG&A while FURY invests at 210.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.