PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.35%
EBIT growth 75-90% of FURY's 75.01%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
60.35%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of FURY's 75.01%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
60.48%
Net income growth above 1.5x FURY's 4.50%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
60.51%
EPS growth above 1.5x FURY's 4.94%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
60.51%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x FURY's 4.94%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.09%
Share count expansion well above FURY's 0.12%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.09%
Diluted share count expanding well above FURY's 0.12%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.92%
OCF growth at 75-90% of FURY's 43.64%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
66.17%
FCF growth above 1.5x FURY's 43.64%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-74.24%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-74.24%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-74.24%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-344.29%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-344.29%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-344.29%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FURY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-45.15%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FURY stands at 47.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-45.15%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 47.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-45.15%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 47.16%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.21%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. FURY's 91.57%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.11%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.61%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.86%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.