PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-269.22%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
100.00%
Positive operating income growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-86.76%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
22.89%
Positive EPS growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
22.89%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-253.81%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-3005.64%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.31%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY stands at 36.48%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-80.31%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY is at 36.48%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-253.02%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY stands at 36.48%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
94.22%
Positive 10Y CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
94.22%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-349.23%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-80.51%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FURY stands at 144.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-80.51%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 144.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-24.33%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 144.03%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
498.50%
Our AR growth while FURY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
1.48%
Positive asset growth while FURY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
6.35%
Positive BV/share change while FURY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.40%
We expand SG&A while FURY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.