PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.05%
EBIT growth above 1.5x FURY's 13.14%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.97%
Negative net income growth while FURY stands at 94.87%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
12.50%
EPS growth under 50% of FURY's 94.88%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
12.50%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of FURY's 94.88%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
14.90%
Share change of 14.90% while FURY is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
14.90%
Diluted share change of 14.90% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.44%
OCF growth at 50-75% of FURY's 11.45%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
84.59%
FCF growth similar to FURY's 82.00%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-54.16%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-54.16%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
13.48%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
14.04%
Below 50% of FURY's 46.31%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
14.04%
Below 50% of FURY's 46.31%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-304.47%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FURY is 46.31%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-49.97%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FURY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-49.97%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-32.13%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.31%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. FURY's 62.87%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.98%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-14.03%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.05%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.