10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.30%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-42.30%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-44.51%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-44.64%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-44.64%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.12%
Share change of 0.12% while FURY is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.12%
Diluted share change of 0.12% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.25%
OCF growth above 1.5x FURY's 38.65%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
64.95%
FCF growth above 1.5x FURY's 38.65%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.15%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to FURY's 70.70%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
-85.04%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is at 67.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-85.04%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is 67.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
26.49%
Below 50% of FURY's 67.03%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-31.29%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FURY stands at 213.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-31.29%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 213.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-39.45%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 213.96%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-85.72%
Firm’s AR is declining while FURY shows 30.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.84%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-6.96%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.30%
SG&A growth well above FURY's 45.72%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.