10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.79%
Negative EBIT growth while FURY is at 15.21%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-8.79%
Negative operating income growth while FURY is at 15.21%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-3.78%
Negative net income growth while FURY stands at 13.64%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-3.33%
Negative EPS growth while FURY is at 16.43%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-3.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FURY is at 16.43%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-771.41%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
4.55%
Positive FCF growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.35%
Positive OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
75.53%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
28.76%
Positive 10Y CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
71.70%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
39.29%
Positive short-term CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-83.91%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FURY stands at 228.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-85.82%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 228.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-77.79%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.98%
AR growth of 40.98% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
323.22%
Inventory growth of 323.22% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-4.94%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-4.57%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.79%
We expand SG&A while FURY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.