PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.33%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-0.97%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-1.33%
Negative net income growth while FURY stands at 8.57%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.05%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FURY's 11.83%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
1.05%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FURY's 11.83%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.37%
Positive OCF growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
7.52%
Positive FCF growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.91%
Positive OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
17.97%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
11.93%
Positive 10Y CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
24.95%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-24.98%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-93.56%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FURY stands at 1888.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-91.11%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 314.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-88.34%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 752.38%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.51%
Negative asset growth while FURY invests at 49.56%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-14.55%
We have a declining book value while FURY shows 27.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.97%
SG&A declining or stable vs. FURY's 50.28%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.