PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.81%
Negative EBIT growth while FURY is at 8.58%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-42.49%
Negative operating income growth while FURY is at 8.58%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-37.81%
Negative net income growth while FURY stands at 114.15%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
22.08%
EPS growth under 50% of FURY's 112.68%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
22.08%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of FURY's 111.96%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
75.89%
Share count expansion well above FURY's 19.66%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
75.89%
Diluted share count expanding well above FURY's 19.63%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-68.24%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-67.89%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.22%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-131.43%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-64.82%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-33.36%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
11.66%
Below 50% of FURY's 165.41%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
18.90%
Below 50% of FURY's 113.98%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-64.05%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FURY stands at 1819.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-52.72%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 421.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-30.24%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 1243.31%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
771.84%
Asset growth above 1.5x FURY's 47.72%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
492.83%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FURY's 29.15%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.49%
We expand SG&A while FURY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.