PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.04%
Positive EBIT growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-0.95%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
42.08%
Positive net income growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
85.19%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x FURY's 67.66%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
85.19%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x FURY's 67.66%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
115.79%
Share count expansion well above FURY's 10.85%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
115.79%
Diluted share count expanding well above FURY's 10.85%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.30%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-84.97%
Negative FCF growth while FURY is at 4.76%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.26%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
9.01%
Positive OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-2134.26%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
38.65%
Positive 10Y CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
28.63%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-33.27%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
65.17%
Equity/share CAGR of 65.17% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
230.13%
Below 50% of FURY's 963.70%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
1346.18%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 736.00%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.48%
Negative asset growth while FURY invests at 149.66%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-53.50%
We have a declining book value while FURY shows 119.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.87%
SG&A declining or stable vs. FURY's 143.31%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.