10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.70%
Gross profit growth under 50% of FURY's 67.44%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
30.65%
Positive EBIT growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
25.81%
Positive operating income growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
30.59%
Positive net income growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
30.77%
Positive EPS growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
30.77%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.04%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FURY's 0.63%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.04%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FURY's 0.63%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.33%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
5.84%
Positive FCF growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.63%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
4.13%
Positive OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-226.52%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-218.34%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-60.31%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-384.62%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
63.19%
Below 50% of FURY's 2495.02%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
149.83%
Below 50% of FURY's 1047.19%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
874.71%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of FURY's 1090.72%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.14%
Firm’s AR is declining while FURY shows 42.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-29.13%
Inventory is declining while FURY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.00%
Negative asset growth while FURY invests at 7.09%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.13%
Under 50% of FURY's 4.11%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.02%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.