PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.42%
Negative gross profit growth while FURY is at 21.43%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-18.70%
Negative EBIT growth while FURY is at 93.25%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-4.01%
Negative operating income growth while FURY is at 93.24%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-18.77%
Negative net income growth while FURY stands at 94.70%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-20.83%
Negative EPS growth while FURY is at 94.92%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-18.75%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FURY is at 94.92%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.56%
Share reduction while FURY is at 1.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.56%
Reduced diluted shares while FURY is at 1.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.87%
OCF growth at 75-90% of FURY's 87.40%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
-116.54%
Negative FCF growth while FURY is at 5.43%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.47%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-206.47%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-150.22%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY stands at 22.72%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
92.12%
Positive 10Y CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-377.45%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-1393.97%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FURY is 50.58%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-46.37%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FURY stands at 924.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
495.46%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FURY's 376.94%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
1957.08%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 26.44%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.92%
Our AR growth while FURY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
10.99%
Inventory growth of 10.99% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
34.49%
Positive asset growth while FURY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
36.38%
Positive BV/share change while FURY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.61%
SG&A growth well above FURY's 10.37%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.