PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.05%
Positive gross profit growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
4.71%
Positive EBIT growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2.30%
Positive operating income growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
4.32%
Positive net income growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-1.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-1.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
5.48%
Share count expansion well above FURY's 8.24%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
5.48%
Diluted share count expanding well above FURY's 8.24%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.72%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
24.28%
Positive FCF growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.95%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-297.14%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-1146.68%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-157.42%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-342.92%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-4884.52%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
75.22%
Below 50% of FURY's 1276.81%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
356.74%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of FURY's 490.07%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
2396.47%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 85.07%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-64.97%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
6.67%
Inventory growth of 6.67% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-3.38%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-8.15%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-5.26%
We’re deleveraging while FURY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.70%
SG&A growth well above FURY's 39.79%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.