PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-309.28%
Negative gross profit growth while FURY is at 12.82%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-32.57%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-28.84%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-32.57%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-24.57%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-24.57%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.17%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FURY's 2.77%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.17%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FURY's 2.77%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-62.25%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-62.94%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.74%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-1251.41%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-12854.72%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-51.75%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-385.52%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-794.31%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
88.07%
Below 50% of FURY's 856.81%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
357.57%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of FURY's 569.50%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
2821.64%
Positive short-term equity growth while FURY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while FURY shows 153.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
2.41%
Positive asset growth while FURY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.06%
Positive BV/share change while FURY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
90.44%
Debt growth of 90.44% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.12%
We cut SG&A while FURY invests at 48.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.