PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.20%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x FURY's 12.77%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
57.98%
EBIT growth above 1.5x FURY's 22.67%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
57.14%
Operating income growth above 1.5x FURY's 22.67%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
55.69%
Net income growth above 1.5x FURY's 18.08%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
56.03%
EPS growth above 1.5x FURY's 18.70%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
55.94%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x FURY's 18.70%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.39%
Share count expansion well above FURY's 0.64%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.39%
Diluted share count expanding well above FURY's 0.64%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.18%
Similar OCF growth to FURY's 50.95%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
-177.05%
Negative FCF growth while FURY is at 54.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-109.63%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-5849.80%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY is at 29.16%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-746.64%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY stands at 3.50%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-1416.20%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-600.04%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is 50.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-447.13%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FURY is 7.04%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
40.96%
Equity/share CAGR of 40.96% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
809.76%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 216.39%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
1934.19%
Positive short-term equity growth while FURY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.94%
Negative asset growth while FURY invests at 8.97%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-4.62%
We have a declining book value while FURY shows 8.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
50.78%
Debt growth of 50.78% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.40%
We cut SG&A while FURY invests at 9.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.