10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.37%
Positive gross profit growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
45.76%
Positive EBIT growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
45.45%
Positive operating income growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
46.59%
Positive net income growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
45.11%
Positive EPS growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
45.11%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.20%
Positive OCF growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
56.14%
Positive FCF growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.36%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-199.08%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-304.59%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-1.97%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-260.28%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-191.43%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
31.59%
Below 50% of FURY's 1061.87%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
828.10%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 253.26%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
2217.64%
Positive short-term equity growth while FURY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.54%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.65%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
2.50%
Debt growth of 2.50% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.99%
We cut SG&A while FURY invests at 108.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.