PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-100.00%
Negative revenue growth while FURY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
73.96%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of FURY's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
16.17%
EBIT growth 50-75% of FURY's 26.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
2.48%
Operating income growth under 50% of FURY's 42.35%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-0.22%
Negative net income growth while FURY stands at 22.31%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-0.69%
Negative EPS growth while FURY is at 22.46%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-0.69%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FURY is at 22.46%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.60%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FURY's 116.36%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.59%
Slight or no buyback while FURY is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.23%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x FURY's 29.60%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
33.19%
FCF growth similar to FURY's 35.25%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.46%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-458.46%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY is at 56.49%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
27.88%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of FURY's 55.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
46.25%
Positive 10Y CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-2405.60%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FURY is 40.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
2.22%
Below 50% of FURY's 56.30%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
54.61%
Positive growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
1193.41%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-62.41%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.73%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
16.36%
Positive asset growth while FURY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.78%
Positive BV/share change while FURY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
151.63%
Debt growth far above FURY's 4.42%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.89%
SG&A growth well above FURY's 46.93%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.