PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.06%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
91.49%
EBIT growth above 1.5x FURY's 39.01%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
100.00%
Operating income growth above 1.5x FURY's 19.65%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
91.68%
Net income growth above 1.5x FURY's 17.56%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
92.40%
EPS growth above 1.5x FURY's 17.70%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
91.77%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x FURY's 17.70%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
9.98%
Share count expansion well above FURY's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.58%
Diluted share count expanding well above FURY's 0.05%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.15%
Positive OCF growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
45.00%
Positive FCF growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.34%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
96.36%
Positive OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
99.25%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 47.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
63.17%
Positive 10Y CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
50.93%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
86.15%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 54.27%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
114.01%
Below 50% of FURY's 407.87%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
2306.49%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 22.55%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-38.56%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 77.03%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.67%
Our AR growth while FURY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.06%
Positive asset growth while FURY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-8.08%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
46.92%
We have some new debt while FURY reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.94%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.