PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.57%
Negative gross profit growth while FURY is at 5.17%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-914.93%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-962.74%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-952.63%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-921.05%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.48%
Share count expansion well above FURY's 0.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.48%
Diluted share count expanding well above FURY's 0.04%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7172.50%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-2.35%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-186.47%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-175.14%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
66.44%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to FURY's 61.50%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
-485.18%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-562.41%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-10.65%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FURY is 49.29%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
116.39%
Below 50% of FURY's 372.78%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
357.67%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-30.23%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FURY is at 81.88%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.85%
Our AR growth while FURY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.21%
Positive asset growth while FURY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
12.74%
Positive BV/share change while FURY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.78%
We have some new debt while FURY reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.02%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.