PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.58%
Revenue growth of 2.58% while FURY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
-0.29%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
55.73%
Positive EBIT growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-39.93%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
1589.95%
Positive net income growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1412.50%
Positive EPS growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1350.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
11.52%
Slight or no buybacks while FURY is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
17.15%
Diluted share count expanding well above FURY's 2.10%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.60%
Positive OCF growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
13.76%
Positive FCF growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4703886.36%
3Y CAGR of 4703886.36% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
837.52%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
869.30%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 84.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
380.28%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 29.17%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
450.21%
Positive 10Y CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
318.45%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 74.45%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
207.56%
Positive short-term CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
322.21%
Below 50% of FURY's 764.22%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
69.00%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
106.51%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of FURY's 136.55%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.52%
Firm’s AR is declining while FURY shows 24.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
18.51%
Inventory growth of 18.51% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
41.95%
Positive asset growth while FURY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
54.35%
Positive BV/share change while FURY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.60%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.50%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.