PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.76%
Revenue growth of 15.76% while FURY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
23.93%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of FURY's 35.43%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
24.05%
EBIT growth below 50% of FURY's 68.07%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
105.71%
Operating income growth above 1.5x FURY's 43.38%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
110.12%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x FURY's 76.62%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
95.24%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x FURY's 76.59%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
105.00%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x FURY's 76.59%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
14.91%
Share count expansion well above FURY's 14.18%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
8.53%
Diluted share count expanding well above FURY's 11.70%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.14%
OCF growth at 75-90% of FURY's 45.65%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
9.89%
FCF growth under 50% of FURY's 56.51%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3757.52%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
3723.19%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 41.66%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
607.62%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1680.79%
Positive 10Y CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
431.09%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
297.41%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 15.84%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
581.22%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of FURY's 674.76%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
14.40%
Below 50% of FURY's 62.44%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
81.95%
Below 50% of FURY's 372.04%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.40%
Our AR growth while FURY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
22.95%
Inventory growth of 22.95% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
3.76%
Positive asset growth while FURY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-7.68%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-13.89%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.23%
SG&A declining or stable vs. FURY's 32.51%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.