PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.91%
Negative revenue growth while FURY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-15.73%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-23.90%
Negative EBIT growth while FURY is at 7.40%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-42.51%
Negative operating income growth while FURY is at 14.88%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-29.19%
Negative net income growth while FURY stands at 7.31%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-34.96%
Negative EPS growth while FURY is at 7.77%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-33.82%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FURY is at 7.77%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
1.93%
Slight or no buybacks while FURY is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.12%
Slight or no buyback while FURY is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-115.46%
Negative OCF growth while FURY is at 35.42%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-132.78%
Negative FCF growth while FURY is at 35.42%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.94%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
34.72%
Below 50% of FURY's 71.47%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
61.39%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x FURY's 45.62%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
367.45%
Positive 10Y CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
232.82%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 69.03%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
173.49%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 26.13%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
372.05%
Below 50% of FURY's 847.98%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
32.63%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of FURY's 65.07%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
115.79%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of FURY's 196.71%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.65%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
10.83%
Inventory growth of 10.83% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-2.56%
Negative asset growth while FURY invests at 2.90%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
2.43%
Under 50% of FURY's 18.33%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-4.31%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.82%
SG&A growth well above FURY's 39.87%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.