PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.72%
Revenue growth of 1.72% while FURY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
-6.23%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-19.86%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-6.23%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-58.14%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-57.75%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-59.49%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-2.14%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
0.64%
Diluted share change of 0.64% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.40%
Positive OCF growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
0.53%
Positive FCF growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3068.75%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
319.68%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 73.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
388.38%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 15.88%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
329.83%
Positive 10Y CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
147.34%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x FURY's 60.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
150.89%
Positive short-term CAGR while FURY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
487.89%
Below 50% of FURY's 1230.83%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
28.48%
Below 50% of FURY's 98.78%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
108.08%
Below 50% of FURY's 268.30%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.84%
Firm’s AR is declining while FURY shows 135.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
5.83%
Inventory growth of 5.83% while FURY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
2.68%
Positive asset growth while FURY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.76%
50-75% of FURY's 5.74%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
20.36%
We have some new debt while FURY reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.42%
We cut SG&A while FURY invests at 3.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.