10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.44%
EBIT growth 75-90% of IAUX's 100.00%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
81.44%
Positive operating income growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
83.34%
Net income growth above 1.5x IAUX's 26.67%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
94.05%
EPS growth above 1.5x IAUX's 47.64%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
94.05%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x IAUX's 47.64%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
181.82%
Share count expansion well above IAUX's 40.99%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
181.82%
Diluted share count expanding well above IAUX's 40.99%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-168.42%
Negative OCF growth while IAUX is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-168.42%
Negative FCF growth while IAUX is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-69.66%
Firm’s AR is declining while IAUX shows 100.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.63%
Negative asset growth while IAUX invests at 18.80%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-66.52%
We have a declining book value while IAUX shows 3.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-81.52%
We cut SG&A while IAUX invests at 47.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.