10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-269.22%
Negative EBIT growth while IAUX is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
100.00%
Positive operating income growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-86.76%
Negative net income growth while IAUX stands at 26.67%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
22.89%
EPS growth under 50% of IAUX's 47.64%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
22.89%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of IAUX's 47.64%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-253.81%
Negative OCF growth while IAUX is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-3005.64%
Negative FCF growth while IAUX is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.31%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-80.31%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-253.02%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while IAUX stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
94.22%
Positive 10Y CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
94.22%
Positive 5Y CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-349.23%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-80.51%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while IAUX stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-80.51%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while IAUX is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-24.33%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
498.50%
AR growth well above IAUX's 100.09%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
100.00%
We show growth while IAUX is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.48%
Asset growth well under 50% of IAUX's 18.80%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
6.35%
BV/share growth above 1.5x IAUX's 3.40%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.40%
SG&A growth well above IAUX's 47.05%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.