10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.77%
EBIT growth 50-75% of IAUX's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
54.67%
Positive operating income growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
58.77%
Net income growth above 1.5x IAUX's 26.67%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
59.21%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x IAUX's 47.64%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
59.21%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x IAUX's 47.64%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
54.13%
OCF growth at 50-75% of IAUX's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
6.15%
FCF growth under 50% of IAUX's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.21%
Positive OCF/share growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
88.21%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of IAUX's 100.00%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
29.53%
Positive 10Y CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
41.88%
Positive 5Y CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
87.90%
Positive short-term CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-44.76%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while IAUX stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-61.64%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while IAUX is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-7.65%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.37%
Negative asset growth while IAUX invests at 18.80%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-5.86%
We have a declining book value while IAUX shows 3.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-54.67%
We cut SG&A while IAUX invests at 47.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.