10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-230.76%
Negative EBIT growth while IAUX is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-300.75%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-637.65%
Negative net income growth while IAUX stands at 26.67%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-700.00%
Negative EPS growth while IAUX is at 47.64%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-700.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while IAUX is at 47.64%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
84.41%
OCF growth at 75-90% of IAUX's 100.00%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
78.99%
FCF growth 75-90% of IAUX's 100.00%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.43%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
99.10%
Positive OCF/share growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
97.47%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to IAUX's 100.00%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
10.73%
Positive 10Y CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
79.91%
Positive 5Y CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
55.04%
Positive short-term CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-91.93%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while IAUX stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-85.28%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while IAUX is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-87.64%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while IAUX shows 100.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
100.00%
We show growth while IAUX is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-8.41%
Negative asset growth while IAUX invests at 18.80%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-15.17%
We have a declining book value while IAUX shows 3.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
230.75%
SG&A growth well above IAUX's 47.05%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.