10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.33%
Negative EBIT growth while IAUX is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.97%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-1.33%
Negative net income growth while IAUX stands at 26.67%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.05%
Share reduction more than 1.5x IAUX's 40.99%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
1.05%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x IAUX's 40.99%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.37%
OCF growth under 50% of IAUX's 100.00%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
7.52%
FCF growth under 50% of IAUX's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.91%
Positive OCF/share growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
17.97%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of IAUX's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
11.93%
Positive 10Y CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
24.95%
Positive 5Y CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-24.98%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-93.56%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while IAUX stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-91.11%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while IAUX is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-88.34%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.51%
Negative asset growth while IAUX invests at 18.80%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-14.55%
We have a declining book value while IAUX shows 3.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.97%
SG&A declining or stable vs. IAUX's 47.05%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.