10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.04%
EBIT growth below 50% of IAUX's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
-0.95%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
42.08%
Net income growth above 1.5x IAUX's 26.67%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
85.19%
EPS growth above 1.5x IAUX's 47.64%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
85.19%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x IAUX's 47.64%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
115.79%
Share count expansion well above IAUX's 40.99%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
115.79%
Diluted share count expanding well above IAUX's 40.99%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.30%
Negative OCF growth while IAUX is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-84.97%
Negative FCF growth while IAUX is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.26%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
9.01%
Positive OCF/share growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-2134.26%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while IAUX stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
38.65%
Positive 10Y CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
28.63%
Positive 5Y CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-33.27%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
65.17%
Equity/share CAGR of 65.17% while IAUX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
230.13%
Equity/share CAGR of 230.13% while IAUX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
1346.18%
Positive short-term equity growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.48%
Negative asset growth while IAUX invests at 18.80%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-53.50%
We have a declining book value while IAUX shows 3.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.87%
SG&A declining or stable vs. IAUX's 47.05%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.