10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
869.08%
Revenue growth of 869.08% while IAUX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
924.01%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of IAUX's 1130.97%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
552.67%
Positive EBIT growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
943.63%
Positive operating income growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
474.29%
Positive net income growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
143.75%
Positive EPS growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
142.75%
Positive diluted EPS growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
8.35%
Share count expansion well above IAUX's 0.25%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
10.81%
Diluted share change of 10.81% while IAUX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
219.93%
Positive OCF growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
154.65%
Positive FCF growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
532.92%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
575.81%
Positive OCF/share growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
278.67%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
723.94%
Positive 10Y CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
974.28%
Positive 5Y CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
266.45%
Positive short-term CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
128.55%
Below 50% of IAUX's 2042.03%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-30.77%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while IAUX is at 2042.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
10.05%
Below 50% of IAUX's 2042.03%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.59%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. IAUX's 29.26%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
10.07%
Inventory growth well above IAUX's 12.07%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
7.70%
Positive asset growth while IAUX is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.48%
Positive BV/share change while IAUX is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.90%
Debt shrinking faster vs. IAUX's 4.80%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.18%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.