10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.72%
Revenue growth under 50% of IAUX's 16.84%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-6.23%
Negative gross profit growth while IAUX is at 86.87%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-19.86%
Negative EBIT growth while IAUX is at 106.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-6.23%
Negative operating income growth while IAUX is at 9.55%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-58.14%
Negative net income growth while IAUX stands at 74.04%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-57.75%
Negative EPS growth while IAUX is at 75.71%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-59.49%
Negative diluted EPS growth while IAUX is at 75.71%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-2.14%
Share reduction while IAUX is at 8.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.64%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x IAUX's 8.17%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.40%
OCF growth at 50-75% of IAUX's 12.70%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
0.53%
FCF growth under 50% of IAUX's 10.83%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3068.75%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
319.68%
Positive OCF/share growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
388.38%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
329.83%
Positive 10Y CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
147.34%
Positive 5Y CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
150.89%
Positive short-term CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
487.89%
Equity/share CAGR of 487.89% while IAUX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
28.48%
Equity/share CAGR of 28.48% while IAUX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
108.08%
Below 50% of IAUX's 2099.88%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.84%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
5.83%
Inventory growth well above IAUX's 1.68%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.68%
Asset growth above 1.5x IAUX's 1.40%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.76%
Positive BV/share change while IAUX is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
20.36%
Debt growth far above IAUX's 13.56%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.42%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.