10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.40%
Revenue growth under 50% of IAUX's 95.51%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
3.99%
Gross profit growth under 50% of IAUX's 596.19%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-335.97%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-37.40%
Negative operating income growth while IAUX is at 29.82%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-1188.31%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-1224.26%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-1287.50%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.22%
Share reduction more than 1.5x IAUX's 3.56%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-5.12%
Reduced diluted shares while IAUX is at 3.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.45%
Negative OCF growth while IAUX is at 90.32%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-19.23%
Negative FCF growth while IAUX is at 74.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1396.49%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
175.98%
Positive OCF/share growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
756.08%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-18.94%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-95.03%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-456.88%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
1373.63%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of IAUX's 1818.88%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
74.79%
Below 50% of IAUX's 1818.88%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
81.70%
Below 50% of IAUX's 1622.42%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.97%
Firm’s AR is declining while IAUX shows 456.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
2.55%
We show growth while IAUX is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-17.28%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-12.49%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-34.48%
We’re deleveraging while IAUX stands at 2.32%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.80%
SG&A declining or stable vs. IAUX's 71.14%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.