PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
51.64%
Positive revenue growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
20.77%
Gross profit growth under 50% of IAUX's 459.92%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-180.56%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
72.34%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x IAUX's 50.54%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
-367.69%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-368.62%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-381.69%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.22%
Slight or no buybacks while IAUX is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.22%
Slight or no buyback while IAUX is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
818.43%
Positive OCF growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-1121.77%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
195.30%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x IAUX's 172.79%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
14434.01%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x IAUX's 12.36%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
3412.29%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x IAUX's 12.36%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
1571.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x IAUX's 38.68%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-47476.14%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-297.95%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-409.43%
Negative 3Y CAGR while IAUX is 1.73%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
1023.12%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with IAUX's 983.87%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
137.82%
Below 50% of IAUX's 983.87%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
80.89%
Positive short-term equity growth while IAUX is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.13%
Our AR growth while IAUX is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
120.96%
Inventory growth well above IAUX's 56.55%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
203.25%
Asset growth above 1.5x IAUX's 0.51%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-12.48%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
19103.99%
Debt growth far above IAUX's 3.18%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
173.81%
SG&A growth well above IAUX's 17.74%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.