10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
90.58%
Revenue growth above 1.5x ITRG's 7.10%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
81.32%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x ITRG's 62.81%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
356.99%
EBIT growth above 1.5x ITRG's 214.92%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
56.24%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of ITRG's 72.65%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
169.04%
Net income growth under 50% of ITRG's 982.60%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
168.18%
Positive EPS growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
159.09%
Positive diluted EPS growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.78%
Share reduction more than 1.5x ITRG's 100029.81%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
20.22%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x ITRG's 100878.84%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.96%
Negative OCF growth while ITRG is at 1.46%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
117.12%
Positive FCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
337.29%
3Y CAGR of 337.29% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
16338.30%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 341.65%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
9977.99%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 177.26%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
270.81%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 151.67%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
27178.37%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 117.08% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
1607.41%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 131.44%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
6396.02%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 134.98%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
3252.61%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 117.37%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
114.35%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
78.54%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 5.04%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
101.30%
Our AR growth while ITRG is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
8.75%
We show growth while ITRG is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.58%
Asset growth well under 50% of ITRG's 7.04%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
10.99%
Positive BV/share change while ITRG is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-5.06%
We’re deleveraging while ITRG stands at 16.35%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.41%
We cut SG&A while ITRG invests at 22.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.