10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-310.14%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-311.34%
Negative operating income growth while ITRG is at 468.55%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-265.20%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-265.45%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-265.45%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-293.70%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-247.94%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-322.65%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG stands at 83.49%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-322.65%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG is at 83.49%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-322.65%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG stands at 83.49%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-1676.68%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is at 8.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-1676.68%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is 8.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-1676.68%
Negative 3Y CAGR while ITRG is 8.79%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-0.73%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while ITRG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-0.73%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while ITRG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-0.73%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while ITRG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
159.20%
AR growth well above ITRG's 104.50%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
1292.45%
Inventory growth of 1292.45% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-4.69%
Negative asset growth while ITRG invests at 6.68%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-7.07%
We have a declining book value while ITRG shows 6.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
311.34%
SG&A growth well above ITRG's 244.79%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.