10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.14%
Negative EBIT growth while ITRG is at 42.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-44.16%
Negative operating income growth while ITRG is at 42.38%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-34.05%
Negative net income growth while ITRG stands at 86.02%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
8.66%
EPS growth under 50% of ITRG's 85.89%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
8.66%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of ITRG's 85.89%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
38.81%
Share change of 38.81% while ITRG is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
38.81%
Diluted share change of 38.81% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-314.73%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-321.61%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-469.67%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-469.67%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-469.67%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-301.52%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is at 70.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-301.52%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is 70.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-301.52%
Negative 3Y CAGR while ITRG is 70.69%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-43.55%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while ITRG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-43.55%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while ITRG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-43.55%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while ITRG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
88.11%
AR growth well above ITRG's 9.52%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.71%
Asset growth above 1.5x ITRG's 1.72%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-13.33%
We have a declining book value while ITRG shows 2.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.25%
We expand SG&A while ITRG cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.