10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.95%
Negative EBIT growth while ITRG is at 66.48%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-21.95%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-22.57%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-22.89%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-22.89%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.43%
Positive OCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
76.02%
Positive FCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.22%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-23.22%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-23.22%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
88.83%
Similar net income/share CAGR to ITRG's 93.35%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
88.83%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to ITRG's 93.35%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
88.83%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to ITRG's 93.35%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
-77.26%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-77.26%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-77.26%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.36%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-619524.61%
Inventory is declining while ITRG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
88.59%
Positive asset growth while ITRG is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
72.07%
Positive BV/share change while ITRG is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.15%
SG&A growth well above ITRG's 20.55%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.