10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.12%
Negative EBIT growth while ITRG is at 87.11%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-21.12%
Negative operating income growth while ITRG is at 87.11%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
35.73%
Net income growth under 50% of ITRG's 84.77%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
54.25%
EPS growth at 75-90% of ITRG's 61.79%. Bill Ackman would push for improved profitability or share repurchases to catch up.
54.25%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of ITRG's 61.79%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
40.22%
Slight or no buybacks while ITRG is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
40.22%
Slight or no buyback while ITRG is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-107.37%
Negative OCF growth while ITRG is at 99.96%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-482.29%
Negative FCF growth while ITRG is at 99.96%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.34%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG stands at 99.06%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-91.34%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG is at 99.06%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-91.34%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG stands at 99.06%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
13.40%
Below 50% of ITRG's 60.51%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
13.40%
Below 50% of ITRG's 60.51%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
13.40%
Below 50% of ITRG's 60.51%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-51.58%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while ITRG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-51.58%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while ITRG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-51.58%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while ITRG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
210.89%
AR growth well above ITRG's 4.52%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
100.00%
We show growth while ITRG is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
4.57%
Positive asset growth while ITRG is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-28.71%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.51%
We expand SG&A while ITRG cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.